Is There Difference Between True And False Philosophy Essay

Is There Difference amongst True And False Philosophy EssayThe distinction between truth and morose is often perceived as an easy distinction to make, like a yes or no dubiousness. If you lie about something for example, t consequently what you atomic number 18 saying is dark, if you tell the truth then it is true up. This is one of mevery misconceptions in aliveness the complexness behind the unequivocal distinction between truths and falsities is immense. How spate an idea be judged to be true or false? One readiness say that a correct fact is true and an incorrect tale is false though the answer varies depending on the area of knowledge from which the statement is perceived. However, in coif for thither to be an dictatorial distinction at that place must be an absolute truth. In this essay I provide question the surviveence of an absolute truth in order to determine whether or non there is an absolute distinction between what is true and what is false.In order to answer the topic question one must eldest seek to make certain terms/parts of the question the first of which is true. What is truth? Different sources attempt to answer this question in different ways. The big dictionary in Ms. Thorntons room defines it as anything that is public and independent of anyones belief Merriam Websters English dictionary as something eternal that is in accordance with fact or reality Dicitonary.com believes it is a judgment or proposition Michael Woolman, in his script Ways of Knowing, believes it is something that is logically necessary. The struggle to accurately define truth is partially due to the fact that we are unable to determine whether or not truth is relative. The second term we must define is false. Merriam Webster believes that something that is false is nor genuine, nor faithful, nor loyal and is also lacking in naturalness and sincerity. Dictionary.com defines a falsity as a firmness of purpose of what is untrue and perhaps treacherous . Lastly, we must define absolute which is perhaps a more concrete denomination than the preceding two however it is significant to this paper to define it. Absolute refers to having no exception, restriction or qualification.In order for there to be an absolute truth, there must be proof. In order to prove an absolute truth, one must have a system of proof with which one can deduce the truths validity in every single situation and under every singly correspond in eternity. An absolute truth must be true for all eternity. It must also live unchanged forever and since we cannot determine whether this is true, and therefore any claim of absolute truth is ridiculous. Some might argue however that by making this statement, I am making an absolute claim. This is however false because there is a possible circumstance under which this claim could not have come throughed before mess could reason. According to hubpages.com The propositional statement There are no absolutes, is definitel y not syntactically absolute, and not absolute in any real cognitive sense. It is a fact, that truth is not an object and does not exist without a mind, and hence impossible to be eternal. It is a fact, that truth is bound within the domain of concepts, and hence impossible to be eternal. It is a fact, that anything claimed as eternal, cannot be proven to be the case, because eternity does not exist in order to be used in the construction of any logically deductive proof. It is a fact, that no claim of truth for anything absolute, can be proven to be true by any stretch of the imagination.In math however we have a set of rules that can define an absolute truth. According to Adam Richards, who holds a degree in philosophy from Oxford, in mathematics we can define an absolute truth or falsity because we precisely define the rules of mathematics. In reality, we need to measure what we ask to know, and since these measurements can never be exact enough, an absolute truth cannot exist. How true or false something is depends on how accurate our measurements were but in the purely deductive world of mathematics, we can define exactly true/false statements. I do not fully agree with Richards because I dont believe that everything in life is a mere calculation however I second his reason for the presence of absolute truths in mathematics.Outside of math any claim of an absolute truth is one that is both based on religious beliefs or is related to religion in one way or another. This is because they are claimed to be given by god. It is safe to say that everyone will agree with the fact that an absolute truth mandates a god due to the fact that it must be eternally true. Without a god there would be no absolute truth because there would be no eternity in the claim. To discredit theses claims, plain though most of the words of god we know today have not been changed, we cannot prove that they will remain unchanged eternally. All bibles and scriptures have undergone ch anges and revisions by humans who have tailored them to suit their tastes. existence are not absolute, and have no system for preventing change to anything that is supposedly absolute (hubpages.com).In conclusion, there is no absolute truth due to our inability to prove a claim eternally, and therefore no absolute distinction between what is true and what is false. Something that is not true is automatically false because there is no third option. If it is partially true or partially false than one can say that it has a true claim and a false claim however it is still classified as either true or false.